Skip to content

§ DOC — Documentation

The reference manual.

Public documentation for how Tasildar Access operates, who qualifies, and what a strong intake looks like. Read before submitting an application.

Required materials, by track.

Below are the exact files and form fields required for each Tasildar Access track, along with annotated examples of strong vs weak submissions. If a required file is missing, intake screen will return your application unread — regardless of how well the rest is written.

Track A

Capital — required materials

For principals deploying their own or fully-controlled capital. Materials must evidence both authority to allocate and a defined investing thesis.

Files to attach

Capital required files
FIELD / FILEREQFORMATNOTES
Thesis memoREQPDF · 2–6 pagesSectors, stage, check size, decision process, prior allocations table.
Track recordREQPDF or spreadsheetLast 8–20 allocations with date, instrument, position size, current mark, IRR or MoIC.
Authority evidenceREQPDF · 1 pageIC seat letter, signatory page, fund formation excerpt, or family office mandate.
Co-investor referencesOPTPDF · 1 pageTwo named principals who have co-invested with you in the last 24 months.

Form fields

Capital form fields
FIELD / FILEREQFORMATNOTES
Deployable capital (next 12 mo)REQUSDNet of committed but unfunded.
Typical check size rangeREQUSD low / high
Sectors / asset classesREQFree text · ≤ 200 charThree or fewer; specific.
Decision authorityREQSingle selectSole signatory · IC member · Recommender.
Hold period appetiteREQYears
Conflicts disclosureREQFree text · ≤ 1000 charBoards, LP commitments, regulated relationships.

STRONG SUBMISSION

  • Thesis memo: 4 pages, names 3 sectors with sub-theses, lists 12 prior checks with marks, declines 2 sectors explicitly.
  • Track record: 16 allocations over 6 years, gross MoIC and DPI by vintage, two write-offs disclosed without spin.
  • Authority: signed IC letter naming you sole signatory up to $750k, counter-signed by GP.
  • Decision authority: "Sole signatory". Conflicts: lists two LP commitments that bar competing sectors.

WEAK SUBMISSION

  • Thesis memo: "Sector-agnostic, opportunistic, founder-first." No prior allocations table.
  • Track record: a screenshot of an AngelList portfolio with no marks, no dates, no check sizes.
  • Authority: "I run a syndicate" with no formation document or signatory evidence.
  • Decision authority: "Recommender". Conflicts: "None."

Track B

Operator — required materials

For active founders and C-suite leaders. Materials must show current operating reality, not a pitch story.

Files to attach

Operator required files
FIELD / FILEREQFORMATNOTES
Company briefREQPDF · 3–8 pagesProblem, mechanism, last 4 quarters of revenue, current team, next 12-month plan.
Cap table summaryREQPDF · 1 pageFounders, employees, prior rounds, fully-diluted ownership %s.
Last quarter financialsREQPDF or spreadsheetP&L, cash position, runway months. Unaudited acceptable.
Customer or contract evidenceOPTPDF · redacted OKTop-3 contracts or signed LOIs. Anonymize counterparties if needed.

Form fields

Operator form fields
FIELD / FILEREQFORMATNOTES
Trailing 12-mo revenueREQUSDRecognized revenue, not bookings.
Current ARRREQUSDIf pre-revenue, write 0 and explain.
FTE countREQIntegerExcludes contractors.
Round size sought (if any)REQUSD or "none"
Prior 5x eventREQFree text · ≤ 500 charRevenue, valuation, exit, or IPO.
Cap-table conflictsREQFree text · ≤ 500 charStrategic investors, board observers.

STRONG SUBMISSION

  • Company brief: 6 pages, quarterly revenue table, names 8 senior hires with start dates, articulates a single clear wedge.
  • Cap table: clean post-Series A, 18% founder, 12% option pool unallocated, prior round at named lead.
  • Financials: real P&L with line items, $4.2M ARR, 14 months runway at current burn.
  • Prior 5x: "Grew prior co. from $300k to $4M ARR over 11 mo before acquisition by [named acquirer]."

WEAK SUBMISSION

  • Company brief: a 24-slide investor deck with vision slides, no revenue table, no team page.
  • Cap table: not provided.
  • Financials: "~$2M ARR-ish, growing fast." No P&L attached.
  • Prior 5x: "Took my last company to the moon. Massive growth."

Track C

Creator — required materials

For audience owners with documented monetization. Materials must distinguish owned audience from rented platforms.

Files to attach

Creator required files
FIELD / FILEREQFORMATNOTES
Audience reportREQPDF · 2–4 pagesList, podcast, or app size by month for last 12 mo. Source of growth. Churn or unsubscribe rate.
Revenue breakdownREQPDF or spreadsheetLast 12 mo revenue by channel: products, sponsorships, memberships, services.
Retention or repeat metricREQPDF · 1 page30/60/90-day retention, repeat-purchase rate, or paid-to-paid conversion.
Sample workOPTURL list3 representative pieces. No greatest-hits reels.

Form fields

Creator form fields
FIELD / FILEREQFORMATNOTES
Owned audience sizeREQIntegerList + podcast + app subs. NOT social followers.
Trailing 12-mo audience revenueREQUSDNet of platform fees.
Primary distribution channelREQSingle selectNewsletter · Podcast · App · YouTube channel · Other.
Platform dependency %REQ0–100Share of revenue from a single platform you do not own.
Sponsor exclusivity statusREQFree text · ≤ 500 charActive exclusivity or category locks.
Niche statementREQFree text · ≤ 200 charOne sentence. No "for everyone" allowed.

STRONG SUBMISSION

  • Audience report: 142k newsletter, 38% open rate, 12-mo growth chart with two flat quarters honestly noted.
  • Revenue: $610k TTM, 58% products, 22% memberships, 14% sponsor, 6% services. Numbers reconcile to a Stripe screenshot.
  • Retention: 71% paid-to-paid annual renewal on the membership.
  • Niche: "Operations playbooks for solo legal practices." Channel dependency: 8%.

WEAK SUBMISSION

  • Audience report: "480k followers across platforms." No list size, no growth chart.
  • Revenue: "Six figures, mostly sponsors." No breakdown.
  • Retention: not provided.
  • Niche: "Lifestyle and entrepreneurship for high performers." Channel dependency: 95% TikTok.

§ NEXT

See annotated end-to-end packs in Example Intake Materials, and confirm what reviewers do with your files in Materials Handling.